Skip to content
Reported Confidence: medium Listed G · Adjacent provider

Galaxy Digital

Nasdaq-listed digital-asset firm developing the Helios AI campus in West Texas, fully leased to CoreWeave (526 MW critical IT).

www.galaxy.com · Record collected 25 Sept 2026

Profile from NeoCloud Observatory research (snapshot 2026-09-25); every figure links to its original source.

Profile

Headquarters
Not yet recorded
Founded
Not yet recorded
Ownership
public · Nasdaq: GLXY
Operating regions
North America
Deployment model
wholesale datacenter capacity
GPU vendors
Not yet recorded
GPU generations
Not yet recorded
Networking
Not yet recorded
Storage
Not yet recorded
Cooling
Not yet recorded
Energy strategy
Not yet recorded
Platform / control plane
Not yet recorded
Business model
Not yet recorded
Differentiation
Not yet recorded

Source: PR Newswire (Galaxy) — Galaxy Completes Phase I of Its Helios Data Center Campus, Delivering 133 MW to CoreWeave

Capacity register

Each sourced figure with its maturity and MW type. Figures of different types are not added together.

No sourced capacity figures recorded.

Projects

ProjectLocationStatusCapacity
Helios AI data center campus

Phase I delivered on schedule; Phase II (260 MW IT) deliveries from H1 2027. Participants: null (tenant). Source: NeoCloud Observatory research.

Source: PR Newswire (Galaxy) — Galaxy Completes Phase I of Its Helios Data Center Campus, Delivering 133 MW to CoreWeave
Spur (Dickens County), Texas, United States partially operational 133 MW (it load, operational)

Disclosed customer contracts

CustomerValueBasisTermDateStatus & source
CoreWeaveneocloud$1.0BAnnualised15 yr1 Jun 2025signed

Value is average ANNUAL revenue (> $1B) across Phases I-III; date approximate.

Source: PR Newswire (Galaxy) — Galaxy Completes Phase I of Its Helios Data Center Campus, Delivering 133 MW to CoreWeave

Financing & M&A

DateTypeAmountDetail
1 Aug 2025 debt $1.4B Galaxy Digital — Helios project financing Date approximate. Source: PR Newswire (Galaxy) — Galaxy Closes $1.4 Billion Project Financing Facility for Helios

Neocloud Observatory

Evidence-scored analysis

Category G · Adjacent Provider · data quality 68.8/100 · snapshot 25 Sept 2026

Capacity by maturity (MW)

Each stage is reported separately and never added together. Announced GPUs never count as operational.

  • Operational 133 MW
  • Under construction Unknown
  • Contracted 526 MW
  • Secured 800 MW
  • Announced Unknown
  • Stated pipeline Unknown
  • Company target Unknown
GPUs operational
Unknown
GPUs contracted
Unknown
GPUs announced
Unknown

Financial position

Annualised revenue
Unknown
Revenue growth (YoY)
Unknown
Backlog
Unknown
Disclosed contract value
Unknown
Valuation
Unknown
Equity raised (captured)
Unknown
Debt raised (captured)
$1.4B
Total debt (reported)
Unknown
Hyperscaler credit supportnot cash raised
Unknown

Scorecard

score-v1.0 · 0–100 · scores with under 34% evidence coverage stay empty

Business Model Quality 37

evidence coverage 60%

  • contracted revenue model: 45 (weight 0.4) — spot/on-demand oriented
  • model diversity: 22 (weight 0.2) — wholesale_datacenter_capacity
  • margin: unknown (weight 0.25) — no margin data
  • software upside: unknown (weight 0.15) — 0 software layers
Capital Access Insufficient evidence

evidence coverage 30%

  • total capital raised: 54 (weight 0.3) — $1.40B equity+debt captured
  • raised last 12m: unknown (weight 0.25) — UNKNOWN in 12m
  • valuation: unknown (weight 0.2) — no valuation UNKNOWN
  • strategic backers: unknown (weight 0.15) — 0 investors known
  • cost of debt: unknown (weight 0.1) — no rate disclosed
Competitive Moat Insufficient evidence

evidence coverage 0%

  • physical control: unknown (weight 0.3) — power/land/DC control
  • software depth: unknown (weight 0.25) — 0 software layers
  • contracted lock in: unknown (weight 0.25) — backlog/contract value UNKNOWN
  • operational reputation: unknown (weight 0.2) — not rated
Concentration Risk (higher = riskier) Insufficient evidence

evidence coverage 20%

  • top customer share: unknown (weight 0.8) — UNKNOWN
  • few customers: 80 (weight 0.2) — 1 disclosed customers
Customer Diversification 20

evidence coverage 40%

  • top customer share: unknown (weight 0.6) — concentration UNKNOWN
  • distinct customers: 20 (weight 0.4) — 1 disclosed customer relationships
Customer Quality 40

evidence coverage 50%

  • hyperscaler or lab: 40 (weight 0.5) — 1 disclosed customers
  • contracted value: unknown (weight 0.5) — disclosed contract value UNKNOWN
Execution Risk (higher = riskier) 64

evidence coverage 70%

  • build to operating ratio: 69 (weight 0.45) — 526 MW to build vs 133 MW operating
  • soft pipeline share: 55 (weight 0.25) — 800 MW secured/announced/speculative
  • organisational youth: unknown (weight 0.3) — founded UNKNOWN
Financial Durability Insufficient evidence

evidence coverage 10%

  • revenue scale: unknown (weight 0.3) — annualised revenue UNKNOWN (n/a)
  • net margin: unknown (weight 0.2) — no margin data
  • cash: unknown (weight 0.2) — cash UNKNOWN
  • backlog coverage: unknown (weight 0.2) — no backlog/revenue
  • public disclosure: 80 (weight 0.1) — public company (audited)
Financial Risk (higher = riskier) Insufficient evidence

evidence coverage 0%

  • losses: unknown (weight 0.3) — no margin data
  • debt to revenue: unknown (weight 0.3) — no debt/revenue data
  • reliance on new capital: unknown (weight 0.25) — n/a
  • revenue scale inverse: unknown (weight 0.15) — revenue UNKNOWN
Geographic Position 29

evidence coverage 100%

  • countries: 18 (weight 0.6) — United States
  • sovereign positioning: 45 (weight 0.4) — no sovereign positioning
GPU Supply Position Insufficient evidence

evidence coverage 0%

  • gpu fleet and contracted: unknown (weight 0.4) — 0 GPUs operational+contracted
  • vendor relationship: unknown (weight 0.3) — no strategic vendor tie evidenced
  • latest generation: unknown (weight 0.3) — no GPU model data
Growth Momentum 44

evidence coverage 45%

  • revenue growth yoy: unknown (weight 0.4) — no growth data
  • capacity momentum: 59 (weight 0.25) — 526 MW contracted/under construction
  • recent major events: 25 (weight 0.2) — 1 major confirmed events in 180d
  • capital raised 12m: unknown (weight 0.15) — raised UNKNOWN in 12m
Infrastructure Execution 56

evidence coverage 100%

  • delivered projects: 100 (weight 0.4) — 1/1 tracked projects (partially) operational
  • operational share of hard mw: 20 (weight 0.4) — 133 of 659 hard MW operational
  • building now: 40 (weight 0.2) — 0 under construction
Management Execution 51

evidence coverage 100%

  • delivered capacity: 55 (weight 0.5) — 133 MW delivered to date
  • milestones 180d: 25 (weight 0.3) — 1 confirmed major milestones (180d)
  • disclosure discipline: 80 (weight 0.2) — public reporting cadence
Operational Capacity 51

evidence coverage 65%

  • operational mw: 51 (weight 0.65) — 133 MW operational (sum of 1 project(s))
  • operational gpus: unknown (weight 0.35) — operational GPUs UNKNOWN
Power Pipeline Quality 61

evidence coverage 80%

  • weighted pipeline mw: 70 (weight 0.5) — ladder-weighted 901 MW
  • hard share: 45 (weight 0.3) — 45% of stated MW is operational/under construction/contracted
  • physical power control: unknown (weight 0.2) — physical-layer control 0/100
Software Platform Maturity Insufficient evidence

evidence coverage 0%

  • software layers: unknown (weight 0.5) — none evidenced
  • software control: unknown (weight 0.25) — software-layer control 0/100
  • independent rating: unknown (weight 0.25) — not rated
Strategic Partnerships 30

evidence coverage 40%

  • vendor equity: unknown (weight 0.4) — no vendor equity evidenced
  • hyperscaler ties: 30 (weight 0.4) — none evidenced
  • exemplar or rating: unknown (weight 0.2) — n/a
Technical Differentiation Insufficient evidence

evidence coverage 0%

  • differentiators: unknown (weight 0.7) — no clear differentiator evidenced
  • independent rating: unknown (weight 0.3) — not rated
Technical Strength Insufficient evidence

evidence coverage 0%

  • independent rating: unknown (weight 0.45) — not rated
  • exemplar cloud: unknown (weight 0.15) — n/a
  • fabric evidence: unknown (weight 0.15) — fabric UNKNOWN
  • stack documentation: unknown (weight 0.25) — 0 technology layers evidenced
Vertical Integration Insufficient evidence

evidence coverage 0%

  • stack control: unknown (weight 1) — 0 of 12 layers evidenced; 12 UNKNOWN
Career Opportunity 43

evidence coverage 44%

  • growth momentum: 44 (weight 0.2) — Growth Momentum
  • capital access: unknown (weight 0.15) — Capital Access
  • technical strength: unknown (weight 0.12) — Technical Strength
  • software platform maturity: unknown (weight 0.12) — Software Platform Maturity
  • power pipeline quality: 61 (weight 0.1) — Power Pipeline Quality
  • geographic position: 29 (weight 0.06) — Geographic Position
  • strategic partnerships: 30 (weight 0.08) — Strategic Partnerships
  • hiring: unknown (weight 0.07) — open roles (public boards)
  • inv financial risk: unknown (weight 0.1) — 100 - financial risk
Data Quality 69

evidence coverage 29%

  • dq coverage: unknown (weight 0) — 0.294
  • dq avg confidence: unknown (weight 0) — 0.88
  • dq primary source pct: unknown (weight 0) — 1.0
  • dq freshness days: unknown (weight 0) — 0
  • dq conflicts: unknown (weight 0) — 0
  • dq missing count: unknown (weight 0) — 12
Worth Investigating? (not investment advice) 47

evidence coverage 68%

  • growth momentum: 44 (weight 0.18) — Growth Momentum
  • technical differentiation: unknown (weight 0.12) — Technical Differentiation
  • customer quality: 40 (weight 0.12) — Customer Quality
  • power pipeline quality: 61 (weight 0.12) — Power Pipeline Quality
  • capital access: unknown (weight 0.12) — Capital Access
  • strategic partnerships: 30 (weight 0.1) — Strategic Partnerships
  • technical strength: unknown (weight 0.08) — Technical Strength
  • infrastructure execution: 56 (weight 0.08) — Infrastructure Execution
  • operational capacity: 51 (weight 0.08) — Operational Capacity
  • novelty bonus: 0 (weight 0.3) — company ≤3 years old
Overall Scale Potential 52

evidence coverage 65%

  • power pipeline quality: 61 (weight 0.3)
  • capital access: unknown (weight 0.25)
  • customer quality: 40 (weight 0.2)
  • operational capacity: 51 (weight 0.15)
  • vertical integration: unknown (weight 0.1)
Overall Survival Probability (5y, %) 65

evidence coverage 13%

  • model: unknown (weight 1) — logistic(durability, capital access, customer quality, risks)

Forecasts (rule-based, P10–P90)

HorizonOperational MWAnnualised revenue
12 months 370 MW (228 MW–529 MW) Unknown
24 months 648 MW (410 MW–887 MW) Unknown
36 months 827 MW (549 MW–1,086 MW) Unknown
60 months 967 MW (668 MW–1,206 MW) Unknown

Stored in an immutable prediction ledger and scored against reported outcomes when they fall due. Predictions, not facts.

Outcome probabilities

Outcome12 mo24 mo36 mo60 mo
Remain independent80%61%44%14%
Acquired8%15%22%34%
Merge3%6%9%14%
Fail9%17%25%38%
Acquire another company8%15%22%34%
Financial distress8%15%22%34%
Major cloud scale (≥2 GW operational or ≥$10B revenue)0%0%0%0%
Remain niche91%82%75%62%
Strategic pivot10%15%20%30%
Exit AI infrastructure1%2%3%5%

Ownership outcomes (independent, acquired, merge, fail) sum to 100% at each horizon; the others are independent events.

Vertical-integration stack

  • energy UNKNOWN No evidence captured (unknown)
  • land UNKNOWN No evidence captured (unknown)
  • data center UNKNOWN No evidence captured (unknown)
  • power cooling UNKNOWN No evidence captured (unknown)
  • gpu hardware UNKNOWN No evidence captured (unknown)
  • network UNKNOWN No evidence captured (unknown)
  • storage UNKNOWN No evidence captured (unknown)
  • bare metal UNKNOWN No evidence captured (unknown)
  • orchestration UNKNOWN No evidence captured (unknown)
  • cloud api UNKNOWN No evidence captured (unknown)
  • ai platform UNKNOWN No evidence captured (unknown)
  • managed ai UNKNOWN No evidence captured (unknown)

Not yet sourced: revenue, revenue run rate, valuation, gpu count, cash, backlog, employees, profile.hq country, profile.ceo, profile.founded year, tech stack, stack control.

Timeline

  1. 10 Jul 2026 · fact

    Galaxy completes Helios Phase I: 133 MW critical IT delivered to CoreWeave

    Source: PR Newswire (Galaxy) — Galaxy Completes Phase I of Its Helios Data Center Campus, Delivering 133 MW to CoreWeave
  2. 1 Aug 2025 · debt

    Galaxy Digital — Helios project financing Date approximate.

    Source: PR Newswire (Galaxy) — Galaxy Closes $1.4 Billion Project Financing Facility for Helios

Recent coverage

Updated 1 Nov 2026, 11:54 UTC

No stories have been collected on this deployment yet. The daily intelligence pipeline collects real published articles from global public RSS/Atom feeds and will populate this list after its first successful run. HYBSIS does not display placeholder news.