Skip to content
Reported Confidence: medium Listed C · GPU cloud

Sharon AI

Nasdaq-listed GPU-as-a-Service provider (US/Australia) with a $4.9B NVIDIA compute collaboration.

sharonai.com · Record collected 25 Sept 2026

Profile from NeoCloud Observatory research (snapshot 2026-09-25); every figure links to its original source.

Profile

Headquarters
Not yet recorded
Founded
Not yet recorded
Ownership
public · Nasdaq: SHAZ
Operating regions
Not yet recorded
Deployment model
gpu hour rental, long term offtake
GPU vendors
Not yet recorded
GPU generations
Not yet recorded
Networking
Not yet recorded
Storage
Not yet recorded
Cooling
Not yet recorded
Energy strategy
Not yet recorded
Platform / control plane
Not yet recorded
Business model
GPUaaS.
Differentiation
Not yet recorded

Sources: Nasdaq (Sharon AI press release) — Sharon AI Reports Second Quarter 2026 Results, SEC EDGAR — SharonAI Holdings Inc. Form 10-Q (Q2 2026)

Capacity register

Each sourced figure with its maturity and MW type. Figures of different types are not added together.

MWMaturityMW typeAs ofStatus & source
212securedunspecified6 Aug 2026
Announced Confidence: high

'Secured AI Factory capacity increases by 80MW to 212MW'.

Source: Nasdaq (Sharon AI press release) — Sharon AI Reports Second Quarter 2026 Results

Disclosed customer contracts

CustomerValueBasisTermDateStatus & source
NVIDIAvendor$4.9BTotal contract value6 yr6 Aug 2026signed

'Strategic compute collaboration' for up to 40,000 GB300 GPUs.

Source: Nasdaq (Sharon AI press release) — Sharon AI Reports Second Quarter 2026 Results
Undisclosed global technology company (APAC)$950.0MTotal contract value5 yr6 Aug 2026signed Source: Nasdaq (Sharon AI press release) — Sharon AI Reports Second Quarter 2026 Results

Neocloud Observatory

Evidence-scored analysis

Category C · GPU Cloud · data quality 71.3/100 · snapshot 25 Sept 2026

Capacity by maturity (MW)

Each stage is reported separately and never added together. Announced GPUs never count as operational.

  • Operational Unknown
  • Under construction Unknown
  • Contracted Unknown
  • Secured 212 MW
  • Announced Unknown
  • Stated pipeline Unknown
  • Company target Unknown
GPUs operational
Unknown
GPUs contracted
Unknown
GPUs announced
Unknown

Financial position

Annualised revenueDERIVED: Q2 2026 annualised
$7.6M
Revenue growth (YoY)
412%
Backlog
Unknown
Disclosed contract value
$5.9B
Valuation
Unknown
Equity raised (captured)
Unknown
Debt raised (captured)
Unknown
Total debt (reported)
Unknown
Hyperscaler credit supportnot cash raised
Unknown

Largest disclosed customer: nvidia · 84% of disclosed contract value

Scorecard

score-v1.0 · 0–100 · scores with under 34% evidence coverage stay empty

Business Model Quality 32

evidence coverage 85%

  • contracted revenue model: 45 (weight 0.4) — spot/on-demand oriented
  • model diversity: 44 (weight 0.2) — gpu_hour_rental, long_term_offtake
  • margin: 0 (weight 0.25) — net margin -22653%
  • software upside: unknown (weight 0.15) — 0 software layers
Capital Access Insufficient evidence

evidence coverage 0%

  • total capital raised: unknown (weight 0.3) — UNKNOWN equity+debt captured
  • raised last 12m: unknown (weight 0.25) — UNKNOWN in 12m
  • valuation: unknown (weight 0.2) — no valuation UNKNOWN
  • strategic backers: unknown (weight 0.15) — 0 investors known
  • cost of debt: unknown (weight 0.1) — no rate disclosed
Competitive Moat Insufficient evidence

evidence coverage 25%

  • physical control: unknown (weight 0.3) — power/land/DC control
  • software depth: unknown (weight 0.25) — 0 software layers
  • contracted lock in: 59 (weight 0.25) — backlog/contract value $5.85B
  • operational reputation: unknown (weight 0.2) — not rated
Concentration Risk (higher = riskier) 79

evidence coverage 100%

  • top customer share: 84 (weight 0.8) — top customer ≈84%
  • few customers: 60 (weight 0.2) — 2 disclosed customers
Customer Diversification 30

evidence coverage 100%

  • top customer share: 23 (weight 0.6) — top customer ≈84% of disclosed value
  • distinct customers: 40 (weight 0.4) — 2 disclosed customer relationships
Customer Quality 50

evidence coverage 100%

  • hyperscaler or lab: 40 (weight 0.5) — 2 disclosed customers
  • contracted value: 59 (weight 0.5) — disclosed contract value $5.85B
Execution Risk (higher = riskier) Insufficient evidence

evidence coverage 25%

  • build to operating ratio: unknown (weight 0.45) — 0 MW to build vs 0 MW operating
  • soft pipeline share: 100 (weight 0.25) — 212 MW secured/announced/speculative
  • organisational youth: unknown (weight 0.3) — founded UNKNOWN
Financial Durability 35

evidence coverage 80%

  • revenue scale: 0 (weight 0.3) — annualised revenue $8M (DERIVED: Q2 2026 annualised)
  • net margin: 0 (weight 0.2) — net margin -22653%
  • cash: unknown (weight 0.2) — cash UNKNOWN
  • backlog coverage: 100 (weight 0.2) — backlog/revenue 767.6x
  • public disclosure: 80 (weight 0.1) — public company (audited)
Financial Risk (higher = riskier) 64

evidence coverage 70%

  • losses: 100 (weight 0.3) — net margin -22653%
  • debt to revenue: unknown (weight 0.3) — no debt/revenue data
  • reliance on new capital: 0 (weight 0.25) — 12m capital raised / revenue 0.0x
  • revenue scale inverse: 100 (weight 0.15) — revenue $8M
Geographic Position 45

evidence coverage 40%

  • countries: unknown (weight 0.6) — UNKNOWN
  • sovereign positioning: 45 (weight 0.4) — no sovereign positioning
GPU Supply Position Insufficient evidence

evidence coverage 0%

  • gpu fleet and contracted: unknown (weight 0.4) — 0 GPUs operational+contracted
  • vendor relationship: unknown (weight 0.3) — no strategic vendor tie evidenced
  • latest generation: unknown (weight 0.3) — no GPU model data
Growth Momentum 52

evidence coverage 60%

  • revenue growth yoy: 78 (weight 0.4) — YoY growth 412%
  • capacity momentum: unknown (weight 0.25) — 0 MW contracted/under construction
  • recent major events: 0 (weight 0.2) — 0 major confirmed events in 180d
  • capital raised 12m: unknown (weight 0.15) — raised UNKNOWN in 12m
Infrastructure Execution Insufficient evidence

evidence coverage 0%

  • delivered projects: unknown (weight 0.4) — 0/0 tracked projects (partially) operational
  • operational share of hard mw: unknown (weight 0.4) — 0 of 0 hard MW operational
  • building now: unknown (weight 0.2) — 0 under construction
Management Execution 32

evidence coverage 50%

  • delivered capacity: unknown (weight 0.5) — 0 MW delivered to date
  • milestones 180d: 0 (weight 0.3) — 0 confirmed major milestones (180d)
  • disclosure discipline: 80 (weight 0.2) — public reporting cadence
Operational Capacity Insufficient evidence

evidence coverage 0%

  • operational mw: unknown (weight 0.65) — operational MW UNKNOWN
  • operational gpus: unknown (weight 0.35) — operational GPUs UNKNOWN
Power Pipeline Quality 23

evidence coverage 80%

  • weighted pipeline mw: 37 (weight 0.5) — ladder-weighted 106 MW
  • hard share: 0 (weight 0.3) — 0% of stated MW is operational/under construction/contracted
  • physical power control: unknown (weight 0.2) — physical-layer control 0/100
Software Platform Maturity Insufficient evidence

evidence coverage 0%

  • software layers: unknown (weight 0.5) — none evidenced
  • software control: unknown (weight 0.25) — software-layer control 0/100
  • independent rating: unknown (weight 0.25) — not rated
Strategic Partnerships 30

evidence coverage 40%

  • vendor equity: unknown (weight 0.4) — no vendor equity evidenced
  • hyperscaler ties: 30 (weight 0.4) — none evidenced
  • exemplar or rating: unknown (weight 0.2) — n/a
Technical Differentiation Insufficient evidence

evidence coverage 0%

  • differentiators: unknown (weight 0.7) — no clear differentiator evidenced
  • independent rating: unknown (weight 0.3) — not rated
Technical Strength Insufficient evidence

evidence coverage 0%

  • independent rating: unknown (weight 0.45) — not rated
  • exemplar cloud: unknown (weight 0.15) — n/a
  • fabric evidence: unknown (weight 0.15) — fabric UNKNOWN
  • stack documentation: unknown (weight 0.25) — 0 technology layers evidenced
Vertical Integration Insufficient evidence

evidence coverage 0%

  • stack control: unknown (weight 1) — 0 of 12 layers evidenced; 12 UNKNOWN
Career Opportunity 40

evidence coverage 54%

  • growth momentum: 52 (weight 0.2) — Growth Momentum
  • capital access: unknown (weight 0.15) — Capital Access
  • technical strength: unknown (weight 0.12) — Technical Strength
  • software platform maturity: unknown (weight 0.12) — Software Platform Maturity
  • power pipeline quality: 23 (weight 0.1) — Power Pipeline Quality
  • geographic position: 45 (weight 0.06) — Geographic Position
  • strategic partnerships: 30 (weight 0.08) — Strategic Partnerships
  • hiring: unknown (weight 0.07) — open roles (public boards)
  • inv financial risk: 36 (weight 0.1) — 100 - financial risk
Data Quality 71

evidence coverage 35%

  • dq coverage: unknown (weight 0) — 0.353
  • dq avg confidence: unknown (weight 0) — 0.887
  • dq primary source pct: unknown (weight 0) — 1.0
  • dq freshness days: unknown (weight 0) — 0
  • dq conflicts: unknown (weight 0) — 0
  • dq missing count: unknown (weight 0) — 11
Worth Investigating? (not investment advice) 41

evidence coverage 52%

  • growth momentum: 52 (weight 0.18) — Growth Momentum
  • technical differentiation: unknown (weight 0.12) — Technical Differentiation
  • customer quality: 50 (weight 0.12) — Customer Quality
  • power pipeline quality: 23 (weight 0.12) — Power Pipeline Quality
  • capital access: unknown (weight 0.12) — Capital Access
  • strategic partnerships: 30 (weight 0.1) — Strategic Partnerships
  • technical strength: unknown (weight 0.08) — Technical Strength
  • infrastructure execution: unknown (weight 0.08) — Infrastructure Execution
  • operational capacity: unknown (weight 0.08) — Operational Capacity
  • novelty bonus: 0 (weight 0.3) — company ≤3 years old
Overall Scale Potential Insufficient evidence

evidence coverage 50%

  • power pipeline quality: 23 (weight 0.3)
  • capital access: unknown (weight 0.25)
  • customer quality: 50 (weight 0.2)
  • operational capacity: unknown (weight 0.15)
  • vertical integration: unknown (weight 0.1)
Overall Survival Probability (5y, %) 49

evidence coverage 50%

  • model: unknown (weight 1) — logistic(durability, capital access, customer quality, risks)

Forecasts (rule-based, P10–P90)

HorizonOperational MWAnnualised revenue
12 months 21 MW (4 MW–42 MW) $30.5M ($17.9M–$38.5M)
24 months 64 MW (21 MW–106 MW) $74.9M ($29.7M–$114.2M)
36 months 95 MW (42 MW–148 MW) $132.3M ($39.9M–$232.3M)
60 months 127 MW (64 MW–180 MW) $252.8M ($54.8M–$533.5M)

Stored in an immutable prediction ledger and scored against reported outcomes when they fall due. Predictions, not facts.

Outcome probabilities

Outcome12 mo24 mo36 mo60 mo
Remain independent76%54%34%1%
Acquired8%15%22%34%
Merge3%6%9%14%
Fail13%25%35%51%
Acquire another company8%15%22%34%
Financial distress12%22%31%46%
Major cloud scale (≥2 GW operational or ≥$10B revenue)0%0%0%0%
Remain niche86%75%65%49%
Strategic pivot10%15%20%30%
Exit AI infrastructure1%2%3%5%

Ownership outcomes (independent, acquired, merge, fail) sum to 100% at each horizon; the others are independent events.

Vertical-integration stack

  • energy UNKNOWN No evidence captured (unknown)
  • land UNKNOWN No evidence captured (unknown)
  • data center UNKNOWN No evidence captured (unknown)
  • power cooling UNKNOWN No evidence captured (unknown)
  • gpu hardware UNKNOWN No evidence captured (unknown)
  • network UNKNOWN No evidence captured (unknown)
  • storage UNKNOWN No evidence captured (unknown)
  • bare metal UNKNOWN No evidence captured (unknown)
  • orchestration UNKNOWN No evidence captured (unknown)
  • cloud api UNKNOWN No evidence captured (unknown)
  • ai platform UNKNOWN No evidence captured (unknown)
  • managed ai UNKNOWN No evidence captured (unknown)

Not yet sourced: valuation, power mw.operational, power mw.contracted, gpu count, cash, employees, profile.hq country, profile.ceo, profile.founded year, tech stack, stack control.

Timeline

No projects or events recorded yet.

Recent coverage

Updated 1 Nov 2026, 11:54 UTC

  1. 19 Oct 2026 Data Centre

    GreenSquare SYD1 opens first stage after adaptive reuse of 1995 data center

    Australian data center operator GreenSquare today announced that the first stage of its SYD1 data centre campus in Norwest Business Park, Western Sydney, is now operational, following the adaptive reuse of a data center originally opened in 1995. The AI-ready data center was completed and ready for service in eight…

    W.Media

  2. 19 Oct 2026 Data Centre

    GreenSquare launches first phase of data center campus in Sydney, Australia

    Neocloud Sharon AI taking capacity at former IBM site

    DatacenterDynamics

  3. 2 Oct 2026 Data Centre

    Sharon AI and Lambda secure GPU-backed debt funding

    Combined, the two neoclouds have raised $1.356bn

    DatacenterDynamics

  4. 28 Sept 2026 Data Centre

    Sharon AI to lease capacity from Australia’s GreenSquareDC

    Former IBM site to become host for Aussie neocloud

    DatacenterDynamics